Medical experts say that only one-quarter of……………….and fitness levels will improve when the economy does
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Medical experts say that only one-quarter of……………….and fitness levels will improve when the economy does
The argument given above is a fallacious argument, it lacks a lot of authoritative facts, as the author in the very beginning does not define the target group under the consideration, he should have provided with the targeted age group otherwise his view and even expert’s view seems vague and indefinite which does not produce a very meticulous image of the author, as he points out the difference of physical fitness standards compared to those that of twenty years ago, he fails to explain the vendetta clearly leaving the argument cloudy, has it been the same group tested twenty years ago or the newborns in between, as there are many environmental and other effects always categorizing the target group under examination. The author’s argument have been more valid if he provided us with sufficient details.
Other than that the author exclaims his direct opposition and distress towards experts as fault-full, now to land on such sound grounds and pass on such a statement a lot of proof and knowledge is required otherwise it simply seems like an accusation and a biased orthodox towards certain fellowmen. It might be true that experts has concluded the basis of whole standards wrong but if writer would provide authentic actuarial data his argument may be taken in more seriously than now.
The author states that levels of physical fitness are highest in the areas where the ownership of computers are highest, any reader would traverse this sentence without paying more heed but critics would point out that ownership of computers and users of computers are two separate things, these areas might be the ones where an entrepreneurship of selling computers may be carried out.So no such comparison can be made between owning computer and using computer, apart from this, the main purpose which should have been defined while introducing this topic must be that are the target group use computers for entertainment purposes or educational or occupational? If these three categories are taken into consideration then why no such data sheet be provided? or discussed before?
It is very important to build the relationship between any two categories on solid grounds, the author proclaims that if economy is to be improved so would be the physical fitness, but the determinants of this relationship are missing from the argument. If the target group under study uses computer for entertainment purposes the result would have been different as from the ones who uses computers due to their such occupations in fields of for example IT, in such cases the relationship of physical fitness might be inversely proportional to economics than directly proportional as the author writes. The author writes about the low expenditures made on fitness-related products and services without providing us a more detailed picture rather than a caricature of the situation. There might be other reasons for such less expenditure by the commoners and state than only economy. Everything in this world is tortuously related, just one aspect out of four does not draw us to a specific conclusion.
Thus in actual, we are not certain of what we are dealing with in respect to the small statement given by author. For a more warranted statement, author should discuss each and every aspect scrupulously before reaching to a conclusion at the end.
5/6 or 6/6
Excellent. You are a very hard-working person.